Back to Results

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00463.png

Source: GIUFFRE_MAXWELL  •  Size: 302.8 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 95.1%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-18 Filed 01/03/24 Page 16 of 40 As is readily apparent from the text of the rule, there are two separate ways in which a party can prove that no waiver of attorney-client privilege has occurred: (1) by demonstrating that no waiver exists under federal law; or (2) by demonstrating that no waiver exists under the state law where the disclosure occurred. Between these two possibilities, the drafters of the rule decided to apply the most protective law that governs waiver. See Fed. R. Evid. 502(c), Adv. Comm. Notes (“The [Advisory] Committee [on the Federal Rules of Evidence] determined that the proper solution for the federal court is to apply the law that is most protective of privilege and work product” (emphasis added)). B. Florida Law Florida’s protective law on the attorney-client privilege provides that neither an attorney nor a client may be compelled to divulge confidential communications between a lawyer and client which were made during the rendition of legal services. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 90.502(1)(c). Communication denotes more than just giving legal advice; it also includes giving information to the lawyer to enable him to render sound and informed advice. Hagans v. Gatorland Kubota, LLC/Sentry Ins., 45 So.3d 73, 76 (Fla. 1 DCA 2010). Under Florida law, while the burden of establishing the attorney-client privilege usually rests on the party claiming it, First Union National Bank v. Turney, 824 So.2d 172, 185 (Fla. Ist DCA 2002), when communications appear on their face to be privileged, the burden is on the party seeking disclosure to prove facts which would make an exception to the privilege applicable. Ford Motor Co. v. Hall-Edwards, 997 So.2d 1148, 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Rousso v. Hannon, 146 So.3d 66, 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). In this case, Defendant does not appear to dispute that an attorney-client privilege exists with regard to the communications between Ms. Giuffre and her attorneys. Rather, Defendant’s argument is that the privilege has somehow been 9

Document Preview

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00463.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00463.png
File Size 302.8 KB
OCR Confidence 95.1%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,045 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:34:04.699648