Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00477.png
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-18 Filed 01/03/24 Page 30 of 40
support his extreme assertion that Ms. Giuffre waived her privilege simply by allowing an
affidavit to be filed in a court proceeding.
Defendant also claims Cassell, at his deposition in the Dershowitz case, waived attorney-
client privilege by discussing factual information related to his investigation of Ms. Giuffre’s
allegations (for example, flight log information). Cassell’s deposition testimony did not
constitute a waiver of Ms. Giuffre’s attorney-client privilege. Indeed, Ms. Giuffre’s own
separate attorney (undersigned counsel, Ms. McCawley, from the law firm of Boies, Schiller &
Flexner, LLP) raised a standing objection to Cassell answering any question that would require
divulging any attorney/client communications. McCawley Decl., Ex. 14, deposition excerpt of
Paul Cassell, Volume I, dated Oct. 16, 2015, at 39:24 — 40:2 (“Virginia Roberts does not waive
her attorney/client privilege with her lawyers, and they are not entitled to testify as to
information that she intended to be confidential that she communicated to her lawyers.”).'”
Defendant also argues that because Cassell said at some (unspecified) point in his deposition that
he “knew” some (unidentified) information about Ms. Giuffre, he must have been revealing
attorney-client communications. Mot. to Compel at 17 (“Of course, the information [Cassell and
Edwards] “knew” about [Ms. Giuffre was a direct result of her attorney-client communications
with them... .”). But Cassell knew a vast amount of information about Ms. Giuffre from the
factual record in the case, such as the flight logs demonstrating flights that she took with Epstein
and Defendant on Epstein’s jet. Defendant’s logic is simply incorrect.
E. Ms. Giuffre Will Not Seek to Use Confidential Attorney-Client
Communications in her Action Here.
For all the reasons just explained, Ms. Giuffre has not waived her attorney-client
privilege through events that occurred in the Dershowitz case. But one additional point bears
'° In her “excerpts” from Cassell’s deposition, Defendant has not included this portion. See Menninger Dec., Ex. L.
23
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00477.png |
| File Size | 304.9 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 94.4% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,171 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04 12:34:12.701834 |