Back to Results

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00560.png

Source: GIUFFRE_MAXWELL  •  Size: 295.9 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.9%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-24 Filed 01/03/24 Page 12 of 16 brought to him. Thus, in this defamation case, the testimony of these witnesses are admissible not only to bolster Ms. Giuffre’s testimony about her individual abuse, but because they are simply part of the body of statements whose truth or falsity is at issue in this case. In addition, one of the witnesses that Ms. Giuffre seeks to depose is registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who stands at the center of the case. Indeed, some of the most critical events took place in the presence of just three people: Ms. Giuffre, defendant Maxwell, and Epstein. If Epstein were to tell the truth, his testimony would fully confirm Ms. Giuffre’s account of her sexual abuse. Epstein, however, may well attempt to support Defendant by invoking the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions about his sexual abuse of Ms. Giuffre. Apparently privy to her former boyfriend Epstein’s anticipated plans in this regard,” Defendant makes the claim that it would be a “convoluted argument” to allow Ms. Giuffre to use those invocations against her. Defendant’s Resp. at 3. Tellingly, Defendant’s response brief cites no authority to refute that proposition that adverse inference can be drawn against co- conspirators. Presumably this is because, as recounted in Ms. Giuffre’s opening brief (at pp. 20- 22), the Second Circuit’s seminal decision of LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 1997), squarely upheld the drawing of adverse inferences based on a non-party’s invocation of a Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. The Second Circuit instructed that, the circumstances of given case, rather than status of particular nonparty witness, determines whether nonparty witness' invocation of privilege against self-incrimination is admissible in course of civil litigation. Jd. at122-23. The Second Circuit also held that, in determining whether nonparty witness’ invocation of privilege against self-incrimination in course of civil litigation and "Tn discovery, Defendant Maxwell has produced several emails between Epstein and herself discussing Ms. Giuffre.

Document Preview

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00560.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00560.png
File Size 295.9 KB
OCR Confidence 94.9%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,141 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:34:32.006828