EFTA00724202.pdf

05/11/2010 15:69 FAX 5616845816 SEARCY DENNEY 0001/005 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., Individually, Defendant. DEFENDANT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION DATED APRIL 12. 2010 Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, hereby files his Response to Request for Production propounded by Plaintiff on April 12, 2010 as follows: 1. None. 2. a. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. b. None. 3. Objection as to communications to or from investigators as that is protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. 4. Objection; any such communications are protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. 5. None. 6. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, without waiving objection, there are no fee agreements with any investor. EFTA00724202 06/11/2010 15:69 FAX 5010845810 SEARCY DENNEY Qh002/005 Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXNMAG Edwards' Response to Request for Production dated 4112110 7. None. 8. None. 9. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 10. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 11. None. 12. None. 13. None. 14. None. 15. None. 16. None. 17. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, ambiguous. 18. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 19. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and protected by the work-product privilege. 20. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product privilege. 21. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product and attorney-client privilege. 22. Not yet determined. 2 EFTA00724203 05/11/2010 16:00 FAX 5616845816 SEARCY DENNEY a003/005 Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Edwards' Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 23. Objection. 24. Objection; attorney-client privilege and/or work-product privilege. 25. None in Defendant's possession. 26. None. 27. Nono in Defendant's possession. 3 EFTA00724204 05/11/2010 16:00 FAX 5616845816 SEARCY DENNEY 004/005 Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Edwards' Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 4 rkiCA-4Th isfAy (1 furnished via U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on April-l- , 2010. Jack Scarola Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant, Bradley Edwards 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561 1 By: 4 EFTA00724205 05/11/2010 18:00 FAX 5616845818 SEARCY DENNEY 005/005 Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Edwards' Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 COUNSEL LIST Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike, Esquire Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West P 401 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach FL 33401 Pho • Fax: Attorneys or e rey pstein Gary M. Farmer, Jr. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort La 33301 Pho Fax: Attorneys or L. Marc Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Laud Phon Fax: Counsel for Scott Rothstein 5 EFTA00724206