Back to Results

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00619.png

Source: GIUFFRE_MAXWELL  •  Size: 317.1 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.7%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-28 Filed 01/03/24 Page 26 of 32 two Colorado non-party witnesses the same week in May, so as minimize Plaintiffs counsel’s travel obligations. Plaintiff, however, rescheduled the deposition of Mr. Rizzo in New York for a week after this Court had a hearing, rather than accommodating any attempt to have the New York deposition occur when all counsel were already present in NY. To the extent the Court wishes to consider the good faith efforts of defense counsel in conducting depositions when deciding whether to grant Plaintiff additional time, defense has more than met their burden. Vv. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO TAKE RE-DEPOSE PLAINTIFF AND TO DEPOSE SHARON CHURCHER EXISTS In contrast to the lack of good cause to extend discovery for Plaintiff's six witnesses, Ms. Maxwell seeks leave of the Court to take depositions beyond June 30. First, Ms. Maxwell properly served a deposition subpoena (and provided appropriate notice to Plaintiff's counsel) on Plaintiffs friend, confidante and former-Daily Mail journalist, Sharon Churcher for a deposition to occur in New York on June 16. Menninger Decl. Ex. N. On June 15, the day before her scheduled deposition, Ms. Churcher’s counsel filed a Motion to Quash. That motion is to be heard by this Court on June 23. Should the Court deny the Motion to Quash, Ms. Churcher’s deposition would need to be re-scheduled. Dates in early July would be sufficient for counsel. Similarly, Ms. Maxwell is filing simultaneously with this Motion a request to re-open the deposition of Plaintiff on the grounds, inter alia, that she failed to provide numerous documents (ordered to be produced by this Court) until after her deposition (and still has failed to provide others)!°, she materially changed substantive and significant portions of her testimony after the 1S For example, Ms. Giuffre testified that she had approximately 8 boxes, which included documents pertinent to this case, which she shipped from her home in Colorado to Australia in October 2015 to an undisclosed location (at her deposition, she would not testify where in Australia the boxes were located), and that the boxes had not been searched for responsive documents. Menninger Decl. Ex. D. In repeated conferrals following her deposition, on May 19, her counsel finally agreed to secure the boxes. As of today’s date, the boxes still have not arrived, 23

Document Preview

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00619.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch1_p00619.png
File Size 317.1 KB
OCR Confidence 94.7%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,407 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:34:49.516477