EFTA00725775.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
4-5-2010
DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
Assistant Untied States Attorney
USAO
W.Palm Beach FL 33401
Re Jeffrey Epstein
Deal=
We are in receipt of the letter authored by you on April 2, 2010. First, we
appreciate your review of the appended draft pleading authored by civil
counsel for Mr. Epstein. We have advised civil counsel of your Office's
position. We have been informed, and can accordingly assure you, that the
motion as redrafted will not seek dismissal of the Complaint as a whole, but
instead will seek dismissal only of Count 6 which rests on a predicate which,
unlike Counts 1-5, had not even been enacted at the time of the conduct
alleged by Jane Doe 103. Although the issues of multiplicity of counts and
whether the minimum damage recovery would be $50,000 or $150,000
remain, they will not be litigated via a motion that would, if allowed, result
in a dismissal (even one without prejudice) of the 2255 action.
While we respect (and in fact sought) your opinion as to whether the
earlier draft motion was consistent with the NPA, we do not necessarily
agree with your conclusion that the pleading, if filed, which it will not be,
would have constituted a breach. According to Mr. Epstein's civil counsel it
sought only to dismiss the Complaint without prejudice to its being refilled
under the version of the statute, 18 USC 2255, that was in existence at the
time of the conduct rather than the later version which was enacted after the
conduct at issue ended, see eg pg 22 ("Plaintiff's action should be dismissed
and she should be required to plead her action under the applicable version
of 18 USC 2255") and pg 24 ("the statute in effect during the time of the
alleged conduct applies, not the version, as amended, effective July 27,
2006"). It was never the intent of Mr. Epstein nor his civil counsel to
permanently preclude Jane Doe 103 from bringing a lawsuit under 18 USC
2255.
EFTA00725775
Again, we appreciate your providing us with the Office's position so that
we could in turn provide intelligent guidance to civil counsel.
RB
MGW
Jeffrey Sloman
United States Attorney
USAO
Miami
Robert Senior
First Assistant United States Attorney
USAO
Miami
EFTA00725776
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00725775.pdf |
| File Size | 95.7 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,231 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-12T13:52:18.361883 |