EFTA00727554.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 111
Entered on FLSD Docket 05,21.2009
Page 1 of 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JANE DOE NO. 2,
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 3,
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 4,
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 5,
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
EFTA00727554
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 111
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2009
Page 2 of 6
JANE DOE NO. 6,
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 7,
CASE NO.: 08- CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
C.M.A.,
CASE NO.: 08- CV-80811 -MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE,
CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
Defendant.
DOE II,
CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
VS.
2
EFTA00727555
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 111
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2009
Page 3 of 6
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al.,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 101,
CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 102,
CASE NO.: 08- CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
PLAINTIFFS' JANE DOES 2-7 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THE STYLE ET AL
Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this
Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify
Jane Doe in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Third Party Subpoenas for
Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, and state as follows:
I.
Defendant Epstein filed his Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the
Style, et al., in the cases brought by Jane Does No. 2-7 ("Does 2-7") on May 5 and 6, 2009.
Under S.D.Ra.L.R. 7.1(C), Does No. 2-7' response is due on May 22, 2009.
2.
Plaintiffs request an additional twenty (20) days to respond to the Motion to
3
EFTA00727556
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 111
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2009
Page 4 of 6
Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style, et al. This request for enlargement of time of
twenty (20) days is necessitated primarily by Plaintiffs desire to have the psychiatric expert who
examined the Plaintiffs consider the issue of their public identification and, if appropriate, submit
an expert declaration in response to the relief sought in the Defendant's Motion.
The
enlargement of time requested is sought to provide the expert with adequate time to perform this
work.
3.
Additionally, Plaintiffs' counsel has conflicts with other cases and matters which
necessitate additional time for a response, including, without limitation, a special set hearing and
upcoming trial in John Doe 6 v. Diocese of Orlando, case no. 48-2005-010138-0, Ninth Judicial
Circuit for Orange County, Florida; and an upcoming deadline to file Appellant's initial Brief in
Jane Doe v. Florida International University Board of Trustees case no. 3D09-414, Florida Third
District Court of Appeals.
4.
Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with Defendant's counsel, Robert Critton and
Michael Pike, regarding this request for extension of time.
While Defendant's counsel
represented that Defendant would consent to an extension of time of one (I) week, until May 29,
2009, Defendant opposes any further extension of time.
The grounds stated by Defendant's
counsel for opposing the extension of time requested concern the relief sought in Defendant's
Motion to Strike Cases from the Current Trial Docket, filed on May 19, 2009.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-7 respectfully request an enlargement of time
until June 11, 2009 to file their response to Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane
Doe in the Style, et aL, and for such other and further relief this Court deems just and proper.
Dated: May 21, 2009
Respectfully submitted,
By:
s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)
4
EFTA00727557
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 111
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2009
Page 5 of 6
Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980)
MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
Miami, Florida 33160
Tel:
Fax:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on May 21, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served
this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission
of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for
those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
5
EFTA00727558
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 111
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2009
Page 6 of 6
SERVICE LIST
DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Robert D. Critton, Esq.
/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
6
EFTA00727559
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00727554.pdf |
| File Size | 227.7 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 5,435 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-12T13:52:31.246673 |