EFTA00728866.pdf

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 1 EFTA00728866 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 2 of 4 Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-80993-CTV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant CASE NO.: 08-8081 I-CN-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRAIJOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et a!, 2 EFTA00728867 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 3 of 4 Defendants. DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CW-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. JANE DOE NO. 101, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 09- 130591-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 102 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRA/JOI-INSON ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 101 AND 102'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence (DE 114), filed May 26, 2009. The 3 EFTA00728868 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 4 of 4 motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. See DE's 151, 168. The Court has carefully considered the motion, response, and reply, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court intends to GRANT Plaintiffs' motion for an order for the preservation of evidence. However, Plaintiffs' proposed order is overly broad. Accordingly, the Court directs the parties to attempt to agree upon language for an order directing Defendant to preserve evidence and submit an agreed order to the Court no later than July 20, 2009. If the parties cannot agree, then each party shall submit a proposed order by the foregoing date. In the interim and until further order of the Court, Defendant shall not destroy any evidence in his possession, custody, or control that is relevant to these cases or that may lead to the discovery of evidence relevant to these cases. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6s day of July, 2009 seee ttip, KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to: all counsel of record 4 EFTA00728869