Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch2_p00139.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1325-7 Filed 01/04/24 Page 3 of 30 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Candelaria v. Erickson, 2006 WL 1636817 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)... ececcceseesesseseeseneeseeeceecseeseeseseesceaeaecseceeeecesaeeaeeeeeeaeerees 12 Celle v. Filipino Reporter Enters. Inc., 209 F.3d 163 (2d Cir.2000)......ccesceceseesceseeeeeesenseseeseeecsecseescsecsesseeseseeseeasaecaecaeeesesaeeaeereaeeaserees 20 Design Strategy, Inc. v. Davis, 469 F.3d 284 (2d Cir. 2006)... cceceeccseeseeseseesseseeseseeseecesecseeececseeaeeeeeeaeeasaecseceeeeseeaeeseeeeneeaserees 14 Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Lathman, P.C., 2014 WL 715612 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). cccceceecesceesseseeseesesecseeececsesseeeeseeaeeaeaecaeceeeeseesaeeaeereeeaeerees 18 In re Consol. RNC Cases, 2009 WL 130178 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2009) oo. ccecceccesceceseeseeeeseeseeseeeeseesenecseeseeseneeseeseereates 22, 23 In re Dana Corp., 574 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2009)... eececcecsssesesseseeseeseseeseeseseeseeseeseseeacacaecaeeececaeeaeeseseeaeeaeeeaeeseereaeeas 6 In re Weiss, 703 F.2d 653 (S.D.N.Y. 1983) .cccecessssesesseseeseeseseeseeecesseeseeseseeaeeacaeesecseecaeeseeeeecaeeaeeeeeeeeneenes 18 Murray v. Miron, 2015 WL 4041340 (D. Conmnn., July 1, 2015) oo. ececeeceseesceeeseeseeseeeseeseeecseceeeeceeeseeseeeeaeeaeerees 21 Naylor v. Rotech Healthcare, Inc., 679 F. Supp. 2d 505 (D. Vt. 2009)... ececescesesseseesceeeseeseeeeseeseeesecseeecesaeeseeeeaeeaeeaeeeeaeeneets 20, 21 Nittolo v. Brand, 96 F.R.D. 672 (S.D.N.Y.1983) ..ccecccccccseeseeseseeseeeeseeseeecsecsesaesceseeseecsecseeecaesseeseeseseeseneeneeseereneeaes 22 Robertson v. Dowbenko, 443 F. App'x 659 (2d Cir. 2011) oe eeecececescesceseseeseeseeseseeseeecsecseesesecsecaeeaeseeseeseeecaeeaeeseeeeaeeaeeeee 20 Scheel v. Harris, No. CIV.A. 3:11-17-DCR, 2012 WL 3879279 (E.D. Ky. Sept. 6, 2012)... ccececeseeseeeteeeees 21 Skywark v. Isaacson, 1999 WL 1489038 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 1999) oo ceccceesceceeeseeseeseeeeseescnecseesenecesseeseeeeeeseneeneeas 22 il