Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch2_p00305.png

10 ii 12 13 14 15, 16 Lh 18 Lg 20 21 22 23 24 25. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1325-18 Filed 01/04/24 Page 20 of 23 19 G1ETGIUA And he was not denying they would ever be able to, but seems to seriously question whether or not admissible non-cumulative evidence of the things that were claimed would ever be heard in his court. So I don't actually have a copy of whatever it is that was claimed down there because it's not publicly available, and it certainly was not mentioned in the complaint, wasn't attached to the complaint, it's just somewhere out there that the press has picked up on and published. In the meantime, Mr. Dershowitz is now involved in ongoing battles with plaintiff's lawyers down in Florida. They cross claimed one another for defamation. And she's been participating in that litigation as a non-party as well, although it concerns her attorneys and the same exact allegations. So while others have called her a liar, notably Mr. Dershowitz, and others have denied claims that plaintiff has made, including Buckingham Palace, and while Judge Marra down there has found her claims impertinent and immaterial to the allegations going on in Florida, Ms. Maxwell has not actually ever called her a liar. And your Honor, all of these cases that plaintiff cites to, Davis v. Boeheim, McNamee v. Clemens, all of those cases had complaints which had attached to them the actual statements at issue. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300