Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch3_p00070.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1327-5 Filed 01/05/24 Page 10 of 17 MR. BOIES: I think this is squarely in the court's order, but if you instruct her not to answer, you instruct her not to answer. MR. PAGLIUCA: We'll find out. Id. at pg. 184:14-185:6. Q. “In 2005, were you aware of any effort to destroy records of messages you had taken of women who had called Mr. Epstein in the prior period? MR. PAGLIUCA: Don’t answer that question. It’s outside the court’s order. Id. at pg. 177:5-11. Ample evidence in this case establishes that not only did Defendant recruit underage girls for massage and sexual activities with Epstein, but that she participated in calling the girls; getting other people to bring girls; talking to the girls; taking massages from and leaving messages about the girls; and scheduling the girls to come over. Accordingly, questions concerning written records documenting Defendant’s involvement in, and knowledge of, the girls who “massaged” Epstein is clearly within the ambit of this Court’s Order. For example, a message from July of 2004 records Defendant, “Ms. Maxwell,” giving a message to Mr. Epstein as message from JJ (an underage girl who was 14 years old on the date of the message) that “Mis available on Tuesday no one for tomorrow.” See GIUFFRE001465. 10