Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch3_p00104.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1327-9 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 21 Defendant filed her motion to compel attorney-client communications and work product on May 26, 2016. By Order dated May 27, 2016, the motion was set for argument en June 2, 2016. The motion was taken on submission on that date. Defendant filed a reply on June 6, 2016. Plaintiff filed her motion to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit on May 27, 2016. By Order dated June 6, 2016, the motion was set returnable on June 16, 2016, at which time the motion was deemed fully submitted. Plaintiff filed her motion for leave to file excess pages on June 1, 2016. TI. Applicable Standards Rule 26 “create{s} many options for the district judge [to] manage the discovery process to facilitate prompt and efficient resolution of the lawsuit.” Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 599, 118 S. Ct. 1584, 1597, 140 L. Ed. 2d 759 (1998). It “vests the trial judge with broad discretion to tailer discovery narrowly and to dictate the sequence of discovery.” Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 598, 118 &.