EFTA00745759.pdf

From: To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fwd: Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:23:40 +0000 Begin forwarded message: From: "Steve Hanson" <I Date: June 18, 2010 2:01:00 AM EDT To: < Subject: Fw: Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured Pls show this e to jeff Sent from Steve Hanson's Blackberry Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission and any file or previous e-mail attached to it is intended to be viewed only by the party to which it is addressed and may contain valuable business information that is confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, dissemination or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Tuscano, Michael [M58-PVTC] < To: Steve Hanson Sent: Fri Jun 18 00:07:03 2010 Subject: FW: Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured I was just forwarded this Original Message----- From: Evans, Gareth J.V. [mailto: Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:59 PM To: Tuscano, Michael [MSB-PVTC] Subject: Fw: Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured Whoa Gareth JV Evans (W)I. (M) (F) Web: ---- Original Message --- From: Robert Jonke To: Evans, Gareth J.V. Sent: Thu Jun 17 17:41:20 2010 Subject: Fw: Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured EFTA00745759 --Original Message--- From: Robert Jonke Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:32:41 To: Subject: FW: Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured Beyond Repair A dire report circulating in the Kremlin today that was prepared for Prime Minister Putin by Anatoly Sagalevich of Russia's Shirshov Institute of Oceanology warns that the Gulf of Mexico sea floor has been fractured "beyond all repair" and our World should begin preparing for an ecological disaster "beyond comprehension" unless "extraordinary measures" are undertaken to stop the massive flow of oil into ow Planet's eleventh largest body of water. Most important to note about Sagalevich's warning is that he and his fellow scientists from the Russian Academy of Sciences are the only human beings to have actually been to the Gulf of Mexico oil leak site after their being called to the disaster scene by British oil giant BP shortly after the April 22nd sinking of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform. BP's calling on Sagalevich after this catastrophe began is due to his being the holder of the World's record for the deepest freshwater dive and his expertise with Russia's two Deep Submergence Vehicles MIR 1 and MIR 2 (photo below] which are able to take their crews to the depth of 6,000 meters (19,685 ft). According to Sagalevich's report, the oil leaking into the Gulf of Mexico is not just coming from the 22 inch well bore site being shown on American television, but from at least 18 other sites on the "fractured seafloor" with the largest being nearly 11 kilometers (7 miles) from where the Deepwater Horizon sank and is spewing into these precious waters an estimated 2 million gallons of oil a day. Interesting to note in this report is Sagalevich stating that he and the other Russian scientists were required by the United States to sign documents forbidding them to report their findings to either the American public or media, and which they had to do in order to legally operate in US territorial waters. However, Sagalevich says that he and the other scientists gave nearly hourly updates to both US government and BP officials about what they were seeing on the sea floor, including the US Senator from their State of Florida Bill Nelson who after one such briefing stated to the MSNBC news service "Andrea we're looking into something new right now, that there's reports of oil that's seeping up from the seabed... which would indicate, if that's true, that the well casing itself is actually pierced... underneath the seabed. So, you know, the problems could be just enormous with what we're facing." Though not directly stated in Sagalevich's report, Russian scientists findings on the true state of the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster are beyond EFTA00745760 doubt being leaked to his longtime friend, and former US President George W. Bush's top energy advisor Matthew Simmons, who US media reports state has openly said: "Matthew Simmons is sticking by his story that there's another giant leak in the Gulf of Mexico blowing massive amounts of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. On CNBCs Fast Money, he says he'd be surprised if BP lasted this summer, saying this is disaster is entirely BP's fault." As a prominent oil-industry insider, and one of the World's leading experts on peak oil, Simmons further warns that the US has only two options, "let the well run dry (taking 30 years, and probably mining the Atlantic ocean) or nuking the well." Obama's government, on the other hand, has stated that a nuclear option for ending this catastrophe is not being discussed, but which brings him into conflict with both Russian and American experts advocating such an extreme measure before all is lost, and as we can read as reported by Britain's Telegraph News Service: 'The former Soviet Union (U.S.S.R.) used nuclear weapons on five separate occasions between 1966 and 1981 to successfully cap blown-out gas and oil surface wells (there was also one attempt that failed), which have been documented in a U.S. Department of Energy report on the U.S.S.R.'s peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. Russia is now urging the United States to consider doing the same. Komsomoloskaya Pravda, the best-selling Russian daily newspaper, asserts that although based on Soviet experience there's a one-in-five chance a nuke might not seal the well, it's "a gamble the Americans could certainly risk." Reportedly, the U.S.S.R. developed special nuclear devices explicitly for closing blown-out gas wells, theorizing that the blast from a nuclear detonation would plug any hole within 25 to 50 meters, depending on the device's power. Much as I had idly imagined, massive explosions can be employed to collapse a runaway well on itself, thus plugging, or at least substantially stanching, the flow of oil. "Seafloor nuclear detonation is starting to sound surprisingly feasible and appropriate," University of Texas at Austin mechanical engineer Michael E. Webber is quoted observing, while Columbia University visiting scholar on nuclear policy and former naval officer Christopher Brownfield wrote in the Daily Beast: "We should have demolished this well with explosives over a month ago. And yet we watch in excruciating suspense while BP fumbles through plan after plan to recover its oil and cover its asset." As to the reason for Obama's government refusing to consider nuking this oil well, Sagalevich states in this report that the American's "main concern" is not the environmental catastrophe this disaster is causing, but rather what the impact of using a nuclear weapon to stop this leak would have on the continued production of oil from the Gulf of Mexico, and which in an energy starved World's remains the Planet's only oil producing region able to increase its production. On top of the environmental catastrophe currently unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico the situation may about to get even worse as new reports from the US are confirming the grim predictions of Russian scientists regarding the oil dispersement poisons being used by BP which are being swept up into the clouds and falling as toxic rain destroying every living plant it touches, and as we had detailed in our May 23rd report EFTA00745761 titled 'Toxic Oil Spill Rains Warned Could Destroy North America" To what the final outcome of this catastrophe will be it is not in our knowing other than to state the obvious that the choice facing the American's today is to either stop this disaster now, by any means, or pay dearly for it later. After all, is cheap petrol really worth the cost of destroying our own Earth? BP surely thinks so, let's keep hoping Obama doesn't. www.whatdoesitmean.com/indexl379.htm <http://www.whatdoesitmean.comfindex1379.htm> [Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaignagainst the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their 'agents' against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report "Who Is Sorcha Faal?".] ...... nov•••••••*•••••-***.rers**Inno••••••,•••••••••••••rs••••••••••••••• NOTE: This communication is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any transmission errors. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the communication to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination. distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by E-Mall. Investors should not rely solely on the information contained in this E-Mail. Rather, investors should use the E-Mail as a market analysis starting point. An investor should engage in additional in-depth research in order to develop an informed opinion regarding the merit of an investment opportunity. All statements are opinions only and are not meant to be a solicitation or recommendation to BUY, SELL or HOLD securities. Dominick & Dominick LLC and It's employees do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice. Please do not include private or confidential information such as passwords. account numbers, social security numbers. etc. in emails to us since the confidentiality of Internet emails cannot be guaranteed. Instructions having financial consequences such as trade orders should not be included in your email communications to us since we may not receive or act on your order promptly, or at all if there is a system disruption. E-Mail communications are not considered an official record of your account and do not supersede normal trade confirmations and account statements delivered to you by our clearing firm. E-Mail is subject to monitoring, is retained and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with a legal right to the information. Although Dominick & Dominick LLC attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses. it does not guarantee that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. ...... ••••••••• ..... ..... ••••••••• ...... ..... ••••••••••••••••••••••• Important Notice to Recipients: It is important that you do not use e-mail to request, authorize or effect the purchase or sale of any security or commodity, to send fund transfer instructions, or to effect any other transactions. Any such request, orders, or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will not be processed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. The sender of this e-mail is an employee of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the sender immediately. Erroneous transmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney reserves the right, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to monitor electronic communications. By e-mailing with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney you consent to the foregoing. EFTA00745762