Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch4_p00121.png
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1328-5 Filed 01/05/24 Page 37 of 45
This document is CONFIDENTIAL under the Court’s Protective Order (DE 62)
between the four Jane Does, via Ms. Giuffre's attorneys, would be plainly be subject to attorney
client protection, not to mention work product protection as well.
With regard to contact with "witnesses,” the request is vague, unduly burdensome, and
overbroad. The CVRA case centers on issues surrounding whether the U.S. Government failed
to confer and otherwise protect the rights of victims (including Janes Does 1, 2, 3, and 4) during
plea negotiations with Jeffrey Epstein. Accordingly, some of the main "witnesses" in the case
are the Government prosecutors who handled the plea negotiations. Several of the same
prosecutors who handled the plea negotiations are also involved in defending the CVRA case.
The CVRA has been in litigation for nearly eight years, and there have extensive
communications with the prosecutors (including communications concerning approximately
10,000 pages of documents that were requested by victims’ counsel and provided to Judge Marra
for in camera review). The request appears designed to target all of these communications, and
such communications, going back eight years, would necessitate a review of several hundreds of
thousands of emails over that time to identify communications with the Government prosecutors.
The burden would be substantial and the relevance would be essentially non-existent. Whatever
communications Ms. Giuffre's attorneys would have had with government prosecutors about
CVRA notifications concerning a prosecution of Epstein would not shed light on whether
Defendant Maxwell defames Ms. Giuffre in attacking her as, for example, a liar.
Moreover, many materials related to this case remain under Judge Marra’s protective
order. Accordingly, before Ms. Giuffre’s counsel could even have the option to release certain
materials that the Government has provided to him as an attorney in the case, defendant Maxwell
would have to approach Judge Marra and seek a modification of the protective order.
36
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch4_p00121.png |
| File Size | 302.6 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 95.6% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,115 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04 12:40:57.895337 |