DOJ-OGR-00003716.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page8of16
was sent to more than 6 and probably less than 30 media representatives. The email to the media
members read:
To Whom It May Concern,
Please find attached a quotable statement on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. No further
communication will be provided by her on this matter.
Thanks for your understanding.
Best
Ross
Ross Gow
ACUITY Reputation
Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts—so not a new individual. The allegations made by
Victoria Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue. The original allegations
are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue.
Each time the story is re told [sic] it changes with new salacious details about
public figures and world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms Roberts [sic] that
Alan Derschowitz [sic] is involved in having sexual relations with her, which he
denies.
Ms Roberts claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not
publicised as news, as they are defamatory.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains
the same. Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which
have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek
redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims.
Ex. N.
Eight years after Epstein’s guilty plea, Giuffre brought the defamation action, repeating
many of the allegations she made in her CVRA joinder motion. The complaint alleged that the
January 2015 statement “contained the following deliberate falsehoods”:
(a) That Giuffre’s sworn allegations “against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue.”
(b) That the allegations have been “shown to be untrue.”
(c) That Giuffre’s “claims are obvious lies.”
DOJ-OGR-00003716
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00003716.jpg |
| File Size | 602.4 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 94.5% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,758 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 16:39:58.550419 |