Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch4_p00351.png
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1328-18 Filed 01/05/24 Page 48 of 50
Finally, if Defendant is now seeking sworn affidavits, there is no practicable way to
search for those things. As stated above, upon counsel’s best memory, any affidavits are part of
the CVRA case docket or already produced in this litigation. If there happen to be others, to
search for them, through 8 years of litigation, would certainly be a Herculean task, and not one
that would necessarily yield any responsive documents. Defendant’s requests are poorly drafted.
Defendant’s arguments are unavailing. And, Defendant’s sole case does not go to this request
regarding “statements.” Even an attempt at compliance would be grossly overly burdensome.
The Court should deny Defendant’s motion to compel with regard to these requests.
VI. CONCLUSION
Defendant’s brief is bereft of case law, lacking the authority upon which this Court can
grant her overly-broad requests, many of which have already been fully satisfied. Similarly,
Defendant’s motion for sanctions is completely baseless, and should be denied. For the foregoing
reasons, Ms. Giuffre respectfully requests Defendant’s Motion to Compel and for Sanctions be
denied in its entirety.
DATED: August 17, 2016.
Respectfully Submitted,
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
By: /s/ Meredith Schultz
Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice)
Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice)
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954) 356-0011
David Boies
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
42
Document Details
| Filename | Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch4_p00351.png |
| File Size | 258.7 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 95.2% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,570 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04 12:42:04.318370 |