Back to Results

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch4_p00603.png

Source: GIUFFRE_MAXWELL  •  Size: 319.3 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.8%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1328-41 Filed 01/05/24 Page 11 of 31 Dershowitz also misleadingly describes the Florida defamation action'® between himself and Cassell and Edwards. Remarkably, Dershowitz fails to note that same documents he seeks here (to use in the next installment of his media campaign) are the exact type of documents that Judge Lynch quashed from Dershowitz’s subpoena he served on Ms. Giuffre in the Florida Action. In short, a judge has already ruled that Dershowitz should be denied access to these documents. This baseless motion is nothing more than an attempt to make an end-run around Judge Lynch’s Order, by coming to this Court, and asking for what he was denied by another court. Indeed, Dershowitz fails to reveal three significant facts to this Court. First, Dershowitz fails to reveal to this Court is that he has already been sharply rebuked by a Florida judge for his efforts to take confidential materials to the media. Second, Dershowitz fails to tell this Court that the only ongoing component to his Florida Action concerns sanctions against him for violating that Court’s Order by his continuing to reveal confidential materials.'’ Third, Dershowitz fails to tell this Court that the judge in the Florida Action already denied his request to access these materials.'* The parties to the Florida Action have settled all claims. Accordingly, there is no “compelling need” to reveal these documents to the media as they are wholly immaterial to whether Dershowitz should be sanctioned for violating Judge Lynch’s order, as it pertained to non-party Ms. Giuffre. In other words, the content of these confidential documents has no bearing on the disposition of the Florida Appeal, and Dershowitz cannot claim otherwise. Ms. Giuffre was not a party to the litigation between the attorneys in the Florida Action. During the course of the litigation, however, Dershowitz subpoenaed discovery from Ms. ‘6 Edwards and Cassell y. Dershowitz, Case No. CACE 15-000072, in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial circuit in and for Broward County, Florida (the “Florida Action”), presided over by Judge Lynch. '7 McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 11, June 2, 2016 Notice of Appeal. 1s McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 12, November 12, 2015 Order on Motion to Quash. 6

Document Preview

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch4_p00603.png

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch4_p00603.png
File Size 319.3 KB
OCR Confidence 94.8%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,285 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:43:22.214090