Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch5_p00007.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1330-1 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 13 that the details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government.” DE 324 at 5 (emphasis in original). While Judge Marra struck those allegations, he emphasized that “Jane Doe 3 is free to reassert these factual details through proper evidentiary proof, should [the victims] demonstrate a good faith basis for believing that such details are pertinent to a matter presented for the Court’s consideration. Judge Marra then denied Ms. Giuffre’s motion to join the case, but allowed her to participate as trial witness: “The necessary ‘participation’ of [Ms. Giuffre] . . . in this case can be satisfied by offering . . . properly supported — and relevant, admissible, and non-cumulative — testimony as needed, whether through testimony at trial . . . or affidavits supported in support [of] the relevancy of discovery requests.” DE 324 at 8 (emphasis deleted). 16. In a later supplemental order, Judge Marra stated that the victims “may re-refile these documents omitting the stricken portions.” DE 325. The victims have since refiled these documents. 17. The CVRA case continues to be litigated, and the victims filed a comprehensive motion for summary judgment earlier this year. See DE 361 (filed Feb. 10, 2016; government response not yet filed). THE FLORIDA DEFAMATION CASE 18. In about early January 2015, following the filing of Ms. Giuffre’s motion to join the CVRA case, Dershowitz launched a media attack not only on Ms. Giuffre but also on Mr. Edwards and me. Dershowitz repeatedly and publicly attacked the two of us, saying such things as “if these lawyers, these sleazy unprofessional, unethical lawyers, Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards, if they had just done an hours’ worth of research and work, they would have seen she is lying through her teeth.” http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/01/05/wrn-uk-sex-abuse-allegations-alan-dershowitz-intv.cnn. 6