Back to Results

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch5_p00249.png

Source: GIUFFRE_MAXWELL  •  Size: 291.4 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.4%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1330-17 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 12 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”) files this Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Defendant’s Deposition, and states as follows: INTRODUCTION Plaintiff comes to this Court — for the third time — seeking to reopen the deposition of Ms. Maxwell based on the production of two innocuous documents which she received more than two months ago on August 16, 2016. Ms. Maxwell has twice sat for deposition, approaching 13 hours on the record, far more than the presumptive 7 hour limit under the Federal Rules. During that time, Plaintiff has had a full and fair opportunity to depose Ms. Maxwell on the subject matters she claims are raised by these two emails, and Plaintiff did in fact question Ms. Maxwell on the subjects covered by the emails. Moreover, despite having access to other email communications that are similar in nature and substance to the two email communications Plaintiff now claims are “key” documents, Plaintiff elected to not examine Ms. Maxwell on those similar documents for the purposes she now claims necessitate reopening the deposition. The deposition questions Plaintiff proposes are cumulative, duplicative and Plaintiff had the opportunity to and did obtain the information from other sources making a third deposition of Ms. Maxwell improper. LEGAL STANDARD “A person who has previously been deposed in a matter may be deposed again, but only with leave of the court.” Sentry Ins. v. Brand Mgmt. Inc., No. 10 Civ. 347, 2012 WL 3288178, at *§ (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2012) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(A)(ii)). “Leave should be granted to the extent that doing so is consistent with the factors set forth in Rule 26(b)(2), such as ‘whether the second deposition of the witness would be unnecessarily cumulative, whether the party requesting the deposition has had other opportunities to obtain the same information, and 20 whether the burden of a second deposition outweighs its potential benefit.” /d. (quoting Ganci, 1

Document Preview

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch5_p00249.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch5_p00249.png
File Size 291.4 KB
OCR Confidence 94.4%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,033 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:44:50.911834