DOJ-OGR-00003810.jpg

10 et, i 138 14 15 16 ey 18 a 20 21 aD. 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 30 App.-0811 GALMGIUC to this extent, to require the plaintiff to indicate to me and to the defense if there is anyone else who is going to be active in the litigation. I'll tell you why I feel this way. IT want to be sure that we can enforce the confidential aspect of that agreement, and I think that could be critical down the line. That's the reason for those requests. Now, we also have a motion to compel. MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, can I just get clarification very quickly because I don't want to have to come back to the court so I want to make sure I'm following correctly. Your ruling, because we have a deposition tomorrow that counsel was going to be assisting me with, particularly on the Fifth Amendment -- THE COURT: Can't have access unless I get these materials by then. If I do, that's something else. If I do, fine. Otherwise, they can't have access to the confidential data. They can assist. MS. McCAWLEY: Can I just point something out to the Court as well. a THE COURT: The plaintiff can have any lawyer she wants. The question is the confidential materials. MS. McCAWLEY: Can I just point the Court to one more issue, because this is their protective order. They now said to the Court that these two individuals are witnesses or potential witnesses. The protective order allows in Section G SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0500 DOJ-OGR-00003810