DOJ-OGR-00003813.jpg

10 et, i 138 14 15 16 ey 18 a 20 21 aD. 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 11 of 30 App.-0814 120 G4LMGIUC suggests that the agreements are privileged, as plaintiff argues. She has refused to identify when these individuals began their representations, the nature of the representations. THE COURT: There is a little confusion here, at least =, in my mind, as to what we are talking about. I certainly understand the two gentlemen whose applications I have just dealt with and the third person, who I take it is affiliated with the Boies firm. Obviously, over time the plaintiff has probably conferred with other lawyers. But who cares? Let's assume she has talked to 20 more lawyers. You want all those retainers? That doesn't make any sense. What is the universe we are talking about? MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I certainly understand all of the members of the Boies firm that currently represent her. The third individual, if I understand correctly, is a gentleman by the name of Stan Pottinger. He is a lawyer of some renown. He is also an author of best-selling books. He is listed quite frequently on plaintiff's privilege log as being part and parcel of advice being given to her on, quote/unquote, media issues. THE COURT: “That is ene. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, there are other persons listed on their privilege log. Many are listed as counsel for plaintiff, but others are listed. Attorney giving advice to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0500 DOJ-OGR-00003813