Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00060.png

eye ial, ate) Ale} 14 Ales) 16 Aly) aris} wn) 20 21 Pe) Pe\ 24 25 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-2 Filed 01/08/24 Page 17 of 42 16 XGAQGIUc SEALED that he was his lawyer. In the meantime, Ms. Giuffre made allegations first in Florida that Professor Dershowitz was involved in some of these alleged offenses, and so that triggers a Fifth Amendment right. Mr. Epstein is not saying Professor Dershowitz did anything, but to testify about Professor Dershowitz, has he ever been to your home, again, has the potential to corroborate the allegations made by Mr. Cassell's client. In terms of the waiver argument, the law is very clear that in contrast to an attorney-client privilege, if I was to disclose a privilege in one case, it's disclosed for all cases, but the law is very clear that you can testify in one proceeding and plead the Fifth Amendment in a separate and distinct proceeding. This was an issue that emerged in their reply brief. And if your Honor doesn't mind, I can either send in a supplement -- THRTCOUR IEE ures MR. WEINBERG: -- which lists the cases. They're very clear. The Fifth Amendment is proceeding by proceeding. MR. CASSELL: If we could just have permission to submit parallel responses. MR. WEINBERG: In terms of the subpoena, the documents subpoenaed, Mr. Cassell focuses on three different categories of requests. One is cell records, and he says because we know that Mr. Epstein had phone records back in 2005 when he was the SOUTSORNG DIS TREGT REPORTERS ,7 bi Cy (212) 805-0300