Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00069.png

10 aial il) ay 14 ales) 16 arf 18 AES) Pas wail ae PAE) 24 PMs) Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-2 Filed 01/08/24 Page 26 of 42 2'5 XGAQGIUc SEALED Dershowitz. Dershowitz has already been let out of the bag. The cat is out of the bag on that one. He says, well, don't worry, Judge, I'm going to give you legal authorities to show that on Monday, my client can stand up and tell the government all about Mr. Dershowitz, and then on Tuesday he can pay Oy to jeu don't want to answer those same questions when propounded by Ms. Giuffre. That's not the way a privilege log works. Once you waive privilege over the material, it's waived. He waived it in 2010. We're entitled to answers of the ten questions dealing with Dershowitz, and we're entitled to, what is it, 39 other answers to questions that are not reasonably incriminating. The third area is the traveler statute. He said, look, if my client went to Thailand and then sexually abused girls with Maxwell, that's incriminating, so I'm entitled to assert the Fifth. There are a couple problems with that argument. Remember, crimes committed in foreign countries are not the proper subject of a Fifth Amendment privilege because the Fifth Amendment privilege only applies to American crimes. So now we have to get down to what American crime did Epstein commit or would Epstein be incriminating himself in if he said that in 2010 I saw Maxwell with an underage girl in Thailand. There is only one statute that's been cited by SOUTHERN DISTRI CTIRAPGRT DRS, bit, Cy (212) 805-0300