Back to Results

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00148.png

Source: GIUFFRE_MAXWELL  •  Size: 310.0 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 95.4%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-7 Filed 01/08/24 Page 22 of 29 information from this non-party as set forth in Request 29: “A copy of your most recent paycheck, paycheck stub, earnings statement and any bank statement, credit card statement and any document reflecting any money owed by you to anyone.” This type of current financial information is only being sought for the improper purpose of embarrassing, intimidating, and harassing this non-party. See DaCosta v. City of Danbury, 298 F.R.D. 37 (D. Conn. 2014) (protective order granted with respect to personal information of nonparties, including home addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, children’s names, financial account numbers, and social security numbers). Request 22 (All Modeling Contracts Signed or Entered into By You): Non-party Ransome provided testimony that she did very little modeling while in New York because she was not successful at it, and she also testified that it was mostly freelance modeling. See Pottinger Dec. at Exhibit 1, Ransome Tr. at 82, 85, 112-113, 216, 415. Despite receiving this testimony, Defendant is now insisting that she conduct a search for any modeling contract that Ms. Ransome has signed and produce them. This search is solely for the improper purpose of embarrassing, harassing, and intimidating this non-party witness, and should be precluded. Accordingly, non-party Ransome objects to these Requests which are only being sought for the purpose of harassing and intimidating this non-party witness, and requests that the Court protect her from this clearly, highly personal and harassing discovery. I. DEFENDANT SHOULD BE PRECLUDED FROM ASKING ANY ADDITIONAL DEPOSITION QUESTIONS THAT ARE SOLELY MEANT TO EMBARRASS, INTIMIDATE AND HARASS THIS NON-PARTY. Defendant had Ms. Ransome present for a deposition for over ten hours with breaks, ensuring that Defendant got a full seven (7) hours of tape time as provided by the Rules. Despite this, Defendant seeks to compel Ms. Ransome to sit for additional questions. The following are 18

Document Preview

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00148.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00148.png
File Size 310.0 KB
OCR Confidence 95.4%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,075 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:47:48.429313