Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00163.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-8 Filed 01/08/24 Page 8 of 27 In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, Ransome objects to this request in that she is a non-party and this requests seeks an unlimited number of unspecified communications. Specifically, Ransome objects to this request on the grounds of privilege, the work product doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. Ransome further objects to this request in that it is vague and ambiguous with respect to its reference to “all communications.” Ransome objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing, and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Defamation Action. Ransome objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "communications," which has been broadly defined for an unlimited period of time. Without waiving such objections, all responsive documents in non-party Sarah Ransome’s possession are attached hereto as RANSOME 000001-000016, which should be treated as Confidential pursuant to the parties’ Protective Order. 6. Any photographs containing any image of Virginia Roberts, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Natalya Malyshov, Sarah Kellen, or Nadia Marcincova. RESPONSE: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, Ransome objects to this request in that she is a non-party and this requests seeks an unlimited number of unspecified photographs. Ransome further objects to this request in that it is vague and ambiguous with respect to its reference to all photographs. Ransome objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing, and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Defamation Action. Ransome objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for photographs for an unlimited period of time.