Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00220.png

20 Za 22 23 24 25 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-10 Filed 01/08/24 Page 23 of 64 22 H2G8GIUC ay found int he conclusion from these two premises, Judge, is he third paragraph of the January 2015 statement, that this plaintiff is uttering, quote, obvious lies, the claims are a 2011 and t M of course, e-mails to obvious lies. HE COURT: Meaning all that you have referred to? R. GEE: I'm sorry? HE COURT: Meaning all that you have referred to, the he intervenor's claims? R. GEE: That's a very good question. HE COURT: Yes, it is. R. GEE: The recipients of this quotable statement, are the 6 to 30 journalists to whom Mr. Gow sent . There is no indication whatsoever in the January 2015 statement about which allegations are being referred to and the al legation -- there's two references to allegations in the first paragraph of the January 2015 statement. a M allegation a M S sure exact doubt that HE COURT: Original. R. GEE: Right. If we go back to the original gs -- HE COURT: Those are 2011. R. GEE: That's right, Judge. o let's go back to the original allegations. I'm not ly what are the original allegations. I have no the recipients of this January 2015 statement had no idea what qualifies as, quote, the original allegations. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300