Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00254.png

20 Za 22 23 24 25 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-10 Filed 01/08/24 Page 57 of 64 56 H2G8GIUC defamation. If she proves that the plaintiff was sexually abused, in fact, if I were to concede right now that the plaintiff had been sexually abused, does that mean that she wins the defamation case, Judge? I think not. She has said that three sentences in the January 2015 statement are false, are defamatory. One is, the allegations are false. Sentence number two is, the original allegations have been proven to be untrue. And the third sentence is, the claims are obvious lies. Well, one thing that I took away from Ms. McCawley's conversation with the Court is that she didn't answer your question, Judge. The question was, What does it mean when the January 2015 statement says allegations twice in the first paragraph? What does it mean in the third paragraph when Ms. Maxwell, through Mr. Barton, says the claims, plural, are obvious lies? Ms. McCawley doesn't answer the question because, as I predicted the first time I was up here, there is no answer to that question. She doesn't want to answer the question because she can't answer the question. The Court can't answer the question, and I guarantee you I cannot answer the question. No one knows what that means. As I said before, there is no witness who will testify in this courtroom about what that means, what specific statement is being referenced. It doesn't exist. So what does the plaintiff do? What the plaintiff SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300