Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00269.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-11 Filed 01/08/24 Page 8 of 9 discovery request seeking such work product. Resp. 7. In reply, plaintiff makes the non-sequitur argument that she requested in discovery documents subject to the attorney-client privilege. See PIfs Reply 3-5. This fails to cure the Motion to Compel’s procedural default of failing to identify any unsatisfied discovery request seeking Mr. Barden’s work product. If there is no such unsatisfied discovery request, a fortiori plaintiff is not entitled to any relief under Rule 37. CONCLUSION The Court should deny the motion to compel, and award sanctions. Dated: March 17, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Ty Gee Laura A. Menninger (LM-1374) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice) Ty Gee (pro hac vice) HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10™ Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303.831.7364 Fax: 303.832.2628 Imenninger@hmflaw.com Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell