Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00282.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-14 Filed 01/08/24 Page 3 of 9 Pursuant to this June 20, 2016, Order, Ms. Giuffre took Defendant’s deposition a second time. And — once again — the Defendant refused to answer questions on this subject. And, once again, Ms. Giuffre was forced to move to compel answers. And, once again, the Court ordered Defendant to answer questions about the subjects she had refused to address, enumerating four specific topics: The Plaintiff has moved to compel answers to questions which were the subject of the June 20, 2016 Order. In particular, Defendant refused to answer questions about (a) Johanna Sjoberg , (b) Maria and Annie Farmer , (c) women brought by Tony Figueroa, and (d) other women who gave massages to Jeffrey Epstein (“Epstein”) , and any evidence, circumstances, or records relating to the massages. The Defendant has opposed the motion on the grounds that the questions were repetitive and her previous deposition testimony answered the questions posed. Directions not to answer except on the grounds of privilege or court order are not appropriate with respect to the particular deposition at issue. The motion to compel is granted and Defendant is directed to answer the deposition questions. Sealed Omnibus Order, Nov. 2, 2016, at 7. The Court also indicated that the “deposition will be limited to two hours of questions and answers excluding counsel colloquy.” Jd. at 7-8. Shortly after this order was entered, on November 16, 2016, Defendant moved for reconsideration of the order. On March 23, 2017, this Court refused to reconsider the Order, but reiterated that the third deposition would proceed “limited to the four areas of inquiry referred to in the Order at page 7.” Sealed Order of March 23, 2017 at 4. Defendant’s Deposition about Documents Produced Late. A separate issue arose about Defendant’s belated production of important documents. After the close of discovery on July 31, 2016, Defendant produced two critical emails: one between her and her press agent, Ross Gow, and another between her and Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Giuffre then filed a motion to reopen Defendant on these important documents. DE 466. As explained in length in the motion, these two documents involved central issues in the case,