Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00298.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-15 Filed 01/08/24 Page 10 of 11 Doe 43 by attaching confidential materials to a public filing, and for that their motion must be denied. And, again, the Court need not reach merits of this motion because the Court previously, and unambiguously, held that non-parties cannot disturb this Court’s Protective Order. CONCLUSION For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should deny the Proposed Intervenors’ Motion for Leave to Intervene and to Modify the Protective Order. Dated: October 19, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice) Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 356-0011 David Boies Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Bradley J. Edwards (Pro Hac Vice) FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820 Paul G. Cassell (Pro Hac Vice) S.J. Quinney College of Law University of Utah 383 University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 10