Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch7_p00320.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-17 Filed 01/08/24 Page 5 of 13 Mr. Dershowitz joined the motion. Doc.610. The Court denied the motion. Doc.892. Among other things, the Court found that “the parties and multiple deponents have reasonably relied on the Protective Order in giving testimony and producing documents including evidence of assault, medical records, and emails.” /d. at 6. Mr. Cernovich (Doc.920) and Mr. Dershowitz (Doc.915) filed an appeal, which is pending. In January 2017, while the case at bar was pending, the Giuffre lawyers brought a second lawsuit, Doe 43 v. Epstein, No. 17-cv-616 (S.D.N.Y.). In the case sub judice the Giuffre lawyers had identified their new client, Doe 43, as a witness for Ms. Giuffre in the case at bar, and we deposed and obtained documents relating to Doe 43. In the second lawsuit, Doe 43 (an adult) alleged she, like Ms. Giuffre, had been the victim of sexual abuse and sexual trafficking by Mr. Epstein to prominent men. Doe 43 named multiple defendants, including Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. In October 2017 two of the Doe 43 defendants, Mr. Epstein and Lesley Groff, requested unsealing of numerous Confidential Materials relating to Doe 43’s alleged relationship with Mr. Epstein. Doc.924, at 4. Ms. Giuffre and Doe 43 opposed the motion, arguing in part, “Jane Doe 43 courageously gave her testimony . . . and voluntarily produced documents . . . The documents that she produced contain sensitive information.” Doc.928, at 7. Ms. Giuffre and Doe 43 objected, arguing that the movants were seeking “to humiliate and embarrass Jane Doe 43” by using the Confidential Materials in public filings in the Doe 43 case. Id. 9-10. This Court denied the motion to unseal. It held that the Protective Order did not extend beyond the May 25, 2017, termination of this action. Sealed Op., at 7 (Nov. 14, 2017). “Accordingly,” the Court said: absent “other arrangements . . . agreed upon” regarding the disposal of the protected information, and this Court was informed of no such arrangements, on May 25, 2017, all protected information, including the [materials that are the