Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch8_p00498.png
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-2 Filed 01/09/24 Page 32 of 73
Confidential
Page 118
G. Maxwell - Confidential
massages or sexual activities?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to form
and foundation.
A. No.
Q. When was the last time you had any
communications with Sarah Kellen Vickers?
A. A long time ago. So long, I don't
recall.
Q. Were you aware that Sarah Kellen
Vickers was noticed for a deposition in this
case?
A. I believe I did know that, yes.
Q. Did you have any conversations with
anyone as to whether or not Sarah Kellen
Vickers would or should show up for that
deposition?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Wait a minute, what
does that have to do with the court's
order. Don't answer that question.
Just don't answer it. This is silly.
MR. BOIES: I actually think it is
far from silly. I think it goes to an
obstruction of justice situation that I
think you would be well advised to allow
DMIDTUBWNPFPOCODIDAGVBRWNHE
Page 120
G. Maxwell - Confidential
at all improper. I am not making any
assertions. I'm simply asking
questions. I'm trying to find out what
the facts are.
MR. PAGLIUCA: No, you are not.
MR. BOIES: Yes, lam. You are
trying to keep the facts from coming
out.
MR. PAGLIUCA: No, I'm not. I'm
trying to keep this orderly and not
abusive as to where it is going.
MR. BOIES: This is so far from
abusive.
MR. PAGLIUCA: I think we should
take a lunch break, given it is noon.
MR. BOIES: We will do it in a half
hour, I want to finish this line of
questioning. I will guarantee we are
out by 12:30.
BY MR. BOIES:
Q. Let me ask you about a few other
people.
Nadia Marcinkova, do you know her?
A. Ido.
Page 119
G. Maxwell - Confidential
your client to answer the question on.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Do you have a good
faith basis to suggest that she
suggested that Ms. Kellen not show up at
her deposition yesterday?
MR. BOIES: I don't know whether it
was you, I don't know whether it was
her, I don't know who did it. What I do
know is that she didn't show up, and I
think the evidence will be quite clear
that your client's testimony about the
extent of her relationship with Sarah
Kellen Vickers is not accurate.
And in that context, I think the
circumstances under which it turns out
that she doesn't show up is entirely
appropriate for examination, but that is
something that I'm happy to talk to the
judge about.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. And I hope
that you give him some good faith basis
for the assertions that you are making
here today, which are wholly improper.
MR. BOIES: I don't think they are
Page 121
G. Maxwell - Confidential
Q. Is she anyone with whom Mr. Epstein
had sex?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to form
and foundation.
A. [have no idea.
Q. Is she anyone with whom Mr. Epstein
engaged in sexual activities?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to form
and foundation.
A. Ihave no personal knowledge.
Q. When you say you have no personal
knowledge, what do you mean by personal
knowledge?
A. I mean that I've read the police
reports, so that's the only knowledge I have
of what Nadia or anybody else has with
Jeffrey. I have no way of knowing whether
they did or not. Personal knowledge means
did I know myself.
Q. After you saw the police reports
about Mr. Epstein's relations with Nadia
Marcinkova, did you ever talk to Mr. Epstein
about whether or not that police report was
or was not accurate?
MAGNA®© 31 (Pages 118 to 121)
LEGAL SERVICES
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch8_p00498.png |
| File Size | 549.6 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 94.7% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 3,374 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04 12:50:36.311194 |