Back to Results

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch8_p00805.png

Source: GIUFFRE_MAXWELL  •  Size: 602.5 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.1%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-4 DIDO BWNFPWOOANDOAWNE Page 162 G Maxwell - Confidential someone I don't know. Q. Why is your name reflected on this message pad? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Ihave no idea. You would have to ask whoever took the message. Q. Did you, in the course of your work, regularly take messages for Jeffrey Epstein? A. [already testified I hardly ever did. Q. Would you, in the course of your work, regularly set up appointments for females to come over and give massages for Jeffrey Epstein? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can you specify, females, you mean adults over the age of 18. Q. Did you regularly set up for Jeffery adults over the age of 18 to come for massages? A. I didn't regularly do that, no. Filed 01/09/24 Page 43 of 106 DMIDMNAHBWNHRFPOWODIA UY AWNHE Page 164 G Maxwell - Confidential messages, I don't know about how I would possibly know if somebody I spoke to, one or two times I took a message is, how old they would be but I have never taken a message where I was aware of anything being under the age of 18 and I probably took it so infrequently, it would be impossible. Q. Can you turn to it should be the next page. A. Uh-huh. Q. Do you see at the top, it says, for Mr. J. 11/8/04 and then the name is redacted. It says, I have a female for him. Why would a minor be calling Jeffrey to say they have a female for him? Do you know? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. First of all, I don't know that's a minor, I don't know who took the message. Q. Iwill represent to you these are police reports and minor's names have to be redacted for privacy purposes? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the Page 163 G Maxwell - Confidential Q. Would you take messages with respect to females over the age of 18 to come over for a massage? A. [already testified I hardly ever did take messages. Q. But would you? A. [already testified, I hardly ever -- Q. I know hardly ever, but did you? A. Over the course of time it is possible I may have taken a couple, I have no recollection. I hardly ever did and I did so irregularly that it would hard for me to pinpoint. Q. Did you ever take a message for a female under the age of 18 to come over for a massage or for any other reason to be with Jeffrey Epstein? MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to the form and foundation. A. I[hardly ever took a message. I have absolutely no way of knowing, maybe one of my friends' daughters called to say they were coming to visit me. I have never taken MAGNA® Page 165 G Maxwell - Confidential form and foundation. Q. Do you know why a minor child would be calling Jeffrey and leaving a message to say, quote, I have a female for him? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. I can't testify anything about this message, I don't know anything about it. Q. I'm going to direct your attention to the next 2 If you look at the bottom left, you are going to see a message for Jeffrey, from says she doesn't have a number and left a message that she called. Do you know who i is? A. Ido not. Q. Do you know tha was 13 at the time she placed this call to Jeffrey? A. I don't know who Q. Would Jeffrey regularly have 13 year olds call and leave messages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. 42 (Pages 162 to 165) LEGAL SERVICES

Document Preview

Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch8_p00805.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch8_p00805.png
File Size 602.5 KB
OCR Confidence 94.1%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 3,376 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:51:58.521569