Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch8_p00871.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-5 Filed 01/09/24 Page 3 of 12 Instead, Defendant mischaracterizes the police reports at issue. For example, in her “Factual Background,” what Defendant characterizes as a “simulated sex act” for which Ms. Giuffre “cried rape,” actually is a police report as follows: “T then had [REDACTED] get off of [REDACTED]. I observed that [REDACTED] was very intoxicated, and she was unable to stand on her legs. She was unable to craw] . . .Based on [REDACTED] intoxicated condition, a [sic] ambulance was called to transport her to [REDACTED] to check on her condition. I then met with [REDACTED] and his mother. I advised [REDACTED] of his Miranda rights . . . Upon arrival, at the E.R., I met with [REDACTED] who stated that while enroute to the E.R. she was conducting a head to toe evaluation when the patient stated that she had to urinate. [REDACTED] was assisting [REDACTED] remove her panties when she noticed grass and twig particles in the crotch area of [REDACTED] panties as well as a small amount of blood, an unknown clear substance, and a substance which appeared to be semen. She also saw abrasions on [REDACTED] buttocks. ” See GM 00790-801. To be clear, Defendant will be able to use this report in these proceedings — if she can prove it relevant and otherwise admissible. Indeed, under the protective order, she is permitted to share it with witnesses. Thus, the confidentiality designation made by Ms. Giuffre merely prevent Defendant from running to the press with these reports, which is, of course, what she seeks to do” As is in some of her other briefs, Defendant fails to cite a single case supporting her position. Nor does she respond in any way to the case law advanced by Ms. Giuffre in the instant motion. Instead, Defendant says that the police report documenting Ms. Giuffre’s rape while a minor has her name redacted. Of course, such a redaction does Ms. Giuffre little good when Defendant and her cohorts distribute it to the press - the identity of the victim in the police report will presumably be supplied by Defendant. Indeed, Defendant and/or her joint defense partners have already made it known to the media that this very police report concerns Ms. Giuffre, see * This plan was admitted by her joint defense partner, Alan Dershowitz, in his baseless Motion to Intervene (DE 362).