Giuffre_Maxwell_Batch8_p00873.png

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-5 Filed 01/09/24 Page 5 of 12 this Court’s Protective Order, and cannot be disclosed to the public. For instance, Ms. Sjoberg’s testimony of how Defendant lured her from her school to have sex with Epstein under the guise of answering phones cannot be given to the media’. Similarly, Mr. Rizzo’s testimony about how Defendant took the passport of a 15-year-old Swedish girl and threatened her when she refused to have sex with Epstein cannot be given to the media.° Likewise Mr. Alessi’s testimony about how Defendant brought girls over for Epstein is also under a confidentiality order.’ So too with Mr. Figueroa’s testimony about how Defendant would call him to bring over underage girls and how Defendant and Epstein would have threesomes with Ms. Giuffre.* Defendant’s own admission of how she and Epstein had threesomes with multiple different girls whose names she can’t even remember’ also has been designated as confidential. '° Ms. Giuffre has never sought to challenge Defendant’s sweeping confidentiality designations, which Defendant has freely employed to hide the voluminous incriminating evidence in this case. Defendant, on the other hand, appears to operating from different premises. Knowing that the documentary and testimonial evidence in this case are fatal to all her purported defenses, Defendant appears to be planning a preemptive and one-sided media strike to try to discredit Ms. Giuffre.'’ Indeed, a recent brief before this Court makes clear that Defendant Id. ° Id. "Td. Id. ° See McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 3, Maxwell Dep. Tr. at 59:3-17 (July 22, 2016). 1° Interestingly despite that admission, Defendant has the gall to publically call Ms. Giuffre, a longtime-married, mother of three, a “sexually permissive woman.” "' Tellingly, nowhere in her brief does Defendant mention to the court why she wants to make these documents public.