DOJ-OGR-00000396.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO = be N Ww fe ws Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 28 24 25 CasSecdesbe-cr-00490-RMB Document 18 and telephonic communications as well as the 1591 category. the exercise o! In addition, NPA on several occasions in 2008 an fF discretion shown in the Departmen But the most important thing is tha between the prosecutors Filed 07/16/19 Page 10 of 18 10 in Florida, t of Justice reviewed th d essentially confirmed that Florida was appropriate. t there was communication perhaps through prosecutors in Georgia that took over the cas prosecutors were recused as a result of Judge Marrah's decisions in the CVRA case. We know the government is relying in part on evidence because the Florida that was generated by the Southern back in 2007. District of Florida case They have talked abo records. They that reflect conduct are th same message pads and telephone records t that was exclusively 15, 16, 17 years ago. ut message pads, telephone So we do have a principal position Court at the appropriate time regarding the legal prosecution and whether or not it is appropriately barred. when there is an interstate wire, Can Say as a that we will put to the Lu. ty of this criminal de fense lawyer of 45 years, one district that is conducting an with that district and count on the mailing, travel, and there is investigation, you negotiate Department of Justice to what it does every day decade after is not to go to the second jurisdiction that received the mail that was sent from the immunizing j prosecution on the very same conduc decade after decade, which urisdiction and have a t. We will be briefing SOUTH E RN DISTRICT RE (212) 805-0 PORTERS, P.C. 300 DOJ-OGR-00000396