HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513.jpg

Fit Q: Can you tell us why? A: Well, felt the handling- way the state attorney’s off unusual. I knew that M about this case. I felt tha felt that the appropriate 7. governed the assignment CHAPTER 45 ; that his action met the st from the statute in here. 4 wouldn't return my phone The detective attempt state attorney’s office, Lar Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. vs. 4 nounce that. -.-and she w« a. a civil lawsuit against J effrey Epstein: ; x the letter in hope that he v Eps a3 2008 4 realize that his objectivity November 25, case and ask the governor like that was necessary for Q: At some point you sent a letter to state attorney Barry al a had been submitted to Hus : her. Let me show you what we'll mark as exhibit 3. Let “7 Q: Could you tell us, explain ischer. = » ee: Rriec ou a chance to read through this letter again to help 4 tivity may be lacking in r me give y : a om other words, what evidenc refresh your recollection. B: a q 4 you felt made it potentially A: I’ve _ 1 int, in May of 2006, I'm assuming based on what 4 A: Well...when I first told h oe a ' before that you had had some conversations with " that it was a serious case, | you to a her directly. .. by phone —correct?— prior to this land] that the suspect was Barry Krische 4 a it. And we were— it was i letter. i 4 meeting that he and I we F . d by phone. j & . d conversations in person an : : . —_ ‘ ok ‘But nonetheless in May—May 1, 2006—you felt i 4 Mnown him to be a victim. : ay. 4 © of children. Well. I know tl ite this letter; is that correct? : ia need to write t 3 Statute that addresses tho A: Yes. q 172 q ( HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513