HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010801.jpg

wow on nm PB WwW NY FH ee worn nu bs wn kr OO 249 flew down to Palm Beach during that relevant period of time. Sof have a timeframe not that was provided by your client but that was provided by the externalities of the case. And that timeframe coupled with the manifests clearly exonerate me without any doubt. Q. l want to make sure that I understood what you just said. "I never flew down to Palm Beach during the relevant timeframe"? A. Inever flew down and stayed at Jeffrey's house in Palm Beach during that relevant period of time. Q. Okay. Se you want to withdraw the statement that you never flew down to Palm Beach -- MR. SCOTT: Objection. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. -- during that relevant period of time -- A. Let me be -- MR. SCOTT: Objection. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. -- and what you want to say is, "I never flew down to Palm Beach and stayed at Jeffrey Epstein's house during that timeframe period," correct? wow On Dm BW NY MMM NNN PP PP Ee BP Pp Be OP WHE OW OMNHRU PwWDNH PO 251 Q. Which of the manifests are you referring to when you claim what you have claimed about the manifests, Exhibit Number 6 or Exhibit Number 7? A. [can only tell you that I have reviewed the manifests and they show, to me, that I was never on Jeffrey Epstein's airplane during the relevant period of time. That's all I can tell you now. I'm not in a position where I look at all these documents now. If you point me to any particular trip that shows that I was on Jeffrey Epstein's plane, | would be happy to respond to that. Q. There are two separate collections of documents purporting to be flight manifests for Jeffrey Epstein's plane. When you made the public statements that you made regarding the flight logs or manifests exonerating you, were you referring to Exhibit Number 6 or Exhibit Number 7? A. Ihave no recollection as to which particular exhibits, which are formed for purposes of the legal case, | had reviewed. I know I had reviewed the manifests. Not only had | reviewed the manifests, but others reviewed the manifests and have conclusively told me that their review of the manifests shows that I was right. 250 | MR. SCOTT: Objection, argumentative -- A. Let me be -- MR. SCOTT: -- mischaracterization. A. Let me be clear. A, [never flew down on Jeffrey Epstein's plane during the relevant period of time. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Flew down to where? A. To Palm Beach or anywhere else. I was never on Jeffrey Epstein's plane, according to the flight manifests and according to my own records, during the relevant period of time. { have independent records of my travel which demonstrate that I was not in Jeffrey Epstein's house during the relevant period of time. And -- but the -- talking about the manifests, the manifests conclusively prove that 1 was never on the airplane during the relevant period of time. So I don't know how you can claim that the manifests show that I was with Virginia Roberts during the relevant period of time. They do not do that. And if you would testify under oath to that, I think you could be subject to pretty -- pretty scathing cross examination. So your statement is categorically false, sir. wou Hn eB Wd PB NN MN NN Be PP PP Be Pe Ue WNP Owe OANA MH & WN) PO Q. Who else - MR. SCOTT: Avoid any attorney-client communications either with Ms. -- you know, with your current lawyers, please. THE WITNESS: Okay. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Who told you that they had reviewed the manifests and they confirmed your position? MR. SCOTT: Objection, work product. MR. SCAROLA: Well, you know, Mr. Scott, he can't have it both ways. He can't insert into the record the gratuitous statements that he inserts into the record regarding others having corroborated his inaccurate testimony, and then refuse to tell us who those others are. It constitutes a waiver of whatever privilege might exist. MR. SCOTT: He can -- he can tell who they are. I'm just saying he can't go into communications with them. MR. SCAROLA: Well, he's already said what the communication was. The communication was these manifests prove your position. MR. SCOTT: And he's answered that because based on his review of them, Mr. Scarola. 19 (Pages 249 to 252) www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010801