HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010825.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
01:10:55
04:10:57
04:11:07
04:47:06
04:11:06
01:14:08
On
014113
oO ON Oa hb WH =~
otis
anise 10
ovtrze 11
ona 12
onit22 13
oma 14
orttnzs 15
04:41:30 16
oxiae 17
an30 18
ons 19
ovary 20
oriae 21
ora 22
04:11:46 23
orsias 24
otnaa 25
01:41:50
04:41:53
01:11:55
04:14:56
01:11:58
01:12:02
01:12:06
01:12:08
Oo Ont Ooah wh =
04:92:10
01:12:14 10
01:12:47 1
01:12:20 12
04:12:23 13
01:12:26 14
01:42:28 15
01:42:29 16
09:12:30 1 7
01:42:31 1 8
01:12:31 1 9
04:12:33 20
04:12:37 21
04:12:42 22
O11247 23
04:12:54 24
01:12:52 25
10/20/2015 01:07:28 PM
61
Q. I would like to know why you alleged “and
other minors" given what you have said about your
knowledge of the factual basis, so to speak, for that
allegation.
A. Okay. There are going to be -- I'm going to
end up giving you nine reasons, each of which is
complicated, so I just want to -- if -- if -- I don't
want to be accused of -- of filibustering or anything.
I just want you to know that you have asked a broad
question that's going to require a broad and extended
answer. It -- it --
Q. Answer the question.
A. Okay. Then I'm going to refer to a -~ I have
a -~ well, actually, I don't.
Q. Let me ask you this: Before you refer to
something --
A. Yeah.
Q._ -- please give me your best recollection of
what the basis was, the factual basis that you had in
mind. If the court said to you -- let me put it this
way. If you went to court and Judge Marra said,
Professor Cassell, what's your factual basis for this
allegation? Tell me. What would you say?
A. Right.
MS. McCAWLEY: Wait. Outside the context of
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400
62
anything that's been communicated to you.
MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. You have asked two
different questions now, and I need to understand
which question you are asking.
The question that you posed before just now
was: What was the reason for your including
those allegations in this pleading?
Now you have asked: What is the factual
basis? And that's going back to questions that
we have already covered, and we have, I think,
exhausted the ability to respond to that question
outside of privileged information.
Do you want to go back to the question about:
What was your reason for including those
allegations?
MR. SIMPSON: I'll ask the question a
different way.
MR. SCAROLA: Thank you.
BY MR. SIMPSON:
Q. Mr. Cassell, I'm going to ask you: If you're
in court and Judge Marra said to you, counsel, what is
the factual basis for your allegation that Professor
Dershowitz abused other minors, what would you say? And
if you wouldn't say something because it was privileged,
then don't include it. What would you tell the judge
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400
04:42:55
01:12:56
04,13:00
01:13:00
01:43:02
01:13:04
01:13:06
an ah WH
01:43:08
©
04:43:10
O413:14 10
01:13:14 1 1
01:43:44 1 2
01:43:47 13
041321 14
04:13:21 15
01:43:22 16
ovta26 17
04:13:28 1 8
01:13:30 1 9
01:13:32 20
ONTE36 21
01:13:38 22
04:13:42 23
04:43:46 24
04:13:48 25
03:13:54
03:13:55
01:13:56
01:13:56
01:13:58
04:14:00
01:14:02
On Dm ak Wh =
01:14:09
©
011413
ort420 10
011423 11
oxtazs 12
011427 13
ortaze 14
01:14:31 15
011433 16
ortaas 17
ovtaa? 18
orta4a 19
oisaaa 20
ores 21
outaa? 22
01:14:49 23
ortass 24
ontaso 25
Page 61 to 64 of 151
was your basis for this?
A. Albright. So the initial basis for it
was --
MR. SCAROLA: First of all, let me object
because Professor Cassell is not here as an
expert witness and hypotheticals are
inappropriate. You're calling for speculation on
his part. I'm not going to instruct him not to
answer, but itis an improper question.
MR, SIMPSON: I disagree, but you can answer
the question.
THE WITNESS: Right. So the -- the factual
basis would ~~ we are setting aside
attorney/client communications, right?
BY MR. SIMPSON:
Q. I'masking: What would you tell the judge?
A. Right. So that -~ I -- I -~ that's
speculative to -- I don't think I can give a fair answer
at this point because that would have involved going
back to my client and -~ and carving out what kinds
of things we were going to present to Judge Marra in
light of the posture of the case at that point.
So it's a speculative question. I would
have -- let me just -- without going into any
attorney/client privileged communications, I would have
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400
64
provided an ample factual basis for those allegations.
MR. SIMPSON:
nonresponsive,
BY MR. SIMPSON:
Q. Let me ask it this way: We have talked
about -~ somewhat about the basis for this allegation
I move to strike as
about other minors. Putting aside information as to
which you're claiming privilege, tell me what you knew
as of December 30th, 2014, that formed the factual basis
for your -- for that allegation about other minors.
MR. SCAROLA: And I'll instruct you not to
answer that question for the same reason, that
when the same question was asked earlier, I
instructed you not to answer.
MR. SIMPSON: I'm -- I'm -- maybe we are not
being clear, Jack. I'm asking him to put
aside -- I mean, certainly, he -~ he filed a
pleading. You've asserted privilege as to
certain aspects. I'm simply asking him, putting
aside whatever you're claiming privilege for,
right, so I'm not -- I'm not asking you right now
to tell me anything you're claiming as
privileged.
BY MR. SIMPSON:
Q. Tell me whatever is not privileged that
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010825
16 of 38 sheets
Extracted Information
Dates
Phone Numbers
Document Details
| Filename | HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010825.jpg |
| File Size | 0.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 5,454 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04T16:11:55.580617 |