DOJ-OGR-00000419.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a fan) = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 20 j782epsC kjc the United States, and th Filed 07/16/19 who complain that they were not, litigation in the Southern r ar and alleged victims there has b District of Page 14 of 24 14 in this case xtensiv Florida before Judge Marra on that very subject. In that the prosecutors not adequately notify some discussions and the consummat the NPA. particular, they had no responsibility to do so, victims properly, The consequences because the judge suggeste the declination, a second. solution with the feds. THE COURT: Florida -—- District District of New York. MR. WE NGARTEN: THE COURT: Florida agreement? of tion of fact, from the Southern Distf Let 6 the judge concluded Florida did the victims about the deal and, The United States and that matter con of d, could be voided. Obviously -- MR. WE NGARTEN: before me. And we think about that He does his time —-- It is obviously going to be an impor don't want to misstate. the ongoing took the position that they had treated the overwhelming, that tinues to this day. that matter ar I think three times, that the NPA, for So a defendant negotiates what he thinks is a global Does the nonprosecution agreement in the nonprosecution agreements in the Southern routinely say they are Limited to the Southern Is there a similar provision in the It is not the pretrial motions. What is for sure is that SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 tant part of there was -—- DOJ-OGR-00000419