HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010884.jpg

326 033628 1 couple of lines above it that do refer to Virginia 0338027 1 A. The lawyer -- look, this is not the first 033633 2 Roberts, put it in the context. 033827 2 time -- 033641 3 My question is: Does that, fairly read, 033827 3 Q. I'm not asking the -- 33646 4 constitute testimony that Virginia Roberts and Professor o3xaa20 4 A. -~ a lawyer has cited the wrong line number ox3e4s § Dershowitz were in the house at the same time? 33331 5 ona transcript or something, and if you're suggesting o33681 § A. Those three sentences, three fines. o33e33 6 that -- you know, I will concede that I cited the wrong ossess 67 Q. What -- yes, what the brief cites. o33a38 «7 line number for that particular assertion. o3ses7 8 A. Those -- those three lines: “Not sure. When os3aat 8B Q. And this is what I want to clarify: When you o370 9 Mr. Dershowitz was visiting. Uh-huh. How often did he | 03342 9 say the wrong line number, if you look at the quotation, 033046 10 there is, up above -- you cited 18 to 20 -- 22 to 25 -- o33e46 11 no, 18 to 20. I'msorry. You cited 18 to 20 which is 033706 10 come?" Those -- those three lines, I agree, that looks oa7zio 11 like a miscitation there. I agree with you on that. oss714 12 Q. And isn't it true that -- first of all, 033746 13 nothing else is cited in the brief or elsewhere to o33ass 12 -- do you see that? o33as7 13 A. Ido see 18 to 20, yes. oxsase 14 Q. And those lines don't refer to Virginia 03:37:22 14 support -~ put -- put aside. 033901 15 Roberts coming to the house, correct? 033902 16 A. Lines 18 to 20 do not refer to Virginia 033910 17 Roberts -- oh, no, wait a minute. Now, this is -- 033723 15 Other than Virginia Roberts's own testimony, 03.3726 16 this is the only evidence that you cited to the court to 033730 17 support -- o337a1 18 A. No, no, no, no, no. That would require a oz3012 18 because when I fook at it here, line 15: 033738 19 30-minute answer. o3aa17 19 "Do you have any recollection of V.R., 03:30:20 20 Virginia Roberts, coming to the house when oxa7as 20 Q. Okay. I won't ask you a 30-minute answer -- 03:37:37 21 MR. SCAROLA: How about -- how about wrapping 033738 22 it up then because it's now 12:10. 0337-41 23 MR. SIMPSON: I will wrap it up. I have one 033742 24 more -- one more question. o33743 25 THE WITNESS: Okay. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 033021 21 Prince Andrew was there?" 03:30:23 22 Answer: "It could have been. I'm not sure. 03:39:28 23 "Not sure. When Mr. Dershowitz was 033928 24 visiting?” 03:39:30 25 So now when I read it, actually, I'm now ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 325 327 033743. 1 = +=BY MR. SIMPSON: 03332 1 going to withdraw my earlier answer, I would -- because o3a743 2 Q. And that is: I just want to confirm that you 033935 2 you know, it's getting late in the day. I'm getting a 033747 3 do agree with me that what was cited to the court for 033937 3 little fuzzy here. When Mr. Dershowitz was visiting, 033750 4 the proposition that they were together, in this 03340 4 uh-huh, could be an affirmative answer read in context 33752 5 sentence, doesn't support that proposition? o33045 5 to saying, I don't recall about Prince Andrew, but I do o3:37s4 G A. I will agree with you that there appears to 033947 6 recall Virginia Roberts being there. And I think when 033786 7 bea miscitation of the line number -- of the lines 18 o33e49 % we unpack the entirety of the deposition, which we don't o33a01 8 through 20. ox30s2 8 have time right now, that the context that I'm o33a02 9 Now, you're saying that there is not o3aaxss 9 suggesting now would be accurate. So I am not prepared 033804 10 information outside of 8 -~ lines 18 through 20 to 033087 10 to say, as I sit here right now, that those were the 033308 11 support the allegation, and that's going to require a 033050 11 wrong line numbers. 033011 12 much longer answer. 034001 12 Perhaps those are the correct line numbers, 033012 13 Q. I don't want a long answer, but I do want to 03-4003 13° but what I think I should have done was to cite oats 14 clarify. When you say "outside" -- 034005 14 additional parts of the transcript that would have, in o3aets 15 MR. SCAROLA: You also said one more 033815 16 question. o33eis 17 MR. SIMPSON: Well, I -- let me just finish oszate 18 this, so we are not going to have this hanging, osaato 15 context, made clear that the assertion was correct. oaaots 16 MR. SCAROLA: With that -- oxaois 17 MR. SIMPSON: I -- I just need to finish this o34016 18 one or two questions, but this is the topic, so osao1e 19 fet me finish it. o34019 20 BY MR. SIMPSON: oxao19 21 Q. Did you ever watch the video -- ossotg 22 MR. SCAROLA: Running out of tape -- o3x4o19 23 BY MR. SIMPSON: 03:40:22 24 Q. -- of the transcript? 03.4022 25 MR. SCAROLA: We are also running out of tape ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 (954) 331-4400 10/20/2015 01:08:15 PM Page 324 to 327 of 335 44 of 46 sheets oazaig 19 because I want to make sure we are communicating. 03:36:21 20 THE WITNESS: Okay. Sure. 03:38:21 21 BY MR. SIMPSON: 03:38:22 22 Q. I understand you're -- you're saying that 033825 23 there -- there may be evidence -- 033326 24 A. Yeah. o3:38.27 25 Q. -- elsewhere? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010884