HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011390.jpg

10 fd. 12 [3 14 15 16 i) 18 wife) 20 21 22 23 24 25 87 H3VOGIU1 extremely patient. Let me just take two more minutes to cover point 19. This is Judge Marra's ruling. They say we want to put it in that she lost. Well, in our view, actually, that was a victory. Our goal was to try to get her into the case, and Judge Marra ruled that she could participate by being a witness. Now, are we really going to try the implications of Judge Marra's ruling in a pro bono Crime Victims Rights Act organization ruling? He ruled on this, but allowed this other thing. It's highly, first, irrelevant, and obviously, highly prejudicial in the sense that it's going to divert the jury's attention away from the facts at hand here. And again, Judge Marra only ruled on the first of nine reasons that we offered for putting those allegations in. He said point 1 doesn't work, the others we'll s how things play out... The litigation is moving forward. I can tell you the government will be responding to our summary judgment motion, I believe on May 15th. We'll be replying on July 15th, so the litigation continues. The last point that I'll make is Boylan. This is item 20. Remember, Dershowitz is going to say that Boylan says that Ms. Giuffre said certain things. And we were told that, well, maybe she will be a witness. It's my understanding that Boylan is not on the final SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011390