HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011399.jpg

10 fd. 12 [3 14 15 16 i) 18 wife) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3vlgiu2 THE COURT: Well, that's been cited? it's factually distinguished becaus reiterat MS. SCHULTZ: Well, her about Adelson? 96 what do you say about the case I would say that ting her defamatory statement. you to the case in my brief, Wheelings v. THI [ra] COURT: Let me just get th she is two days later And I would also direct ITacuone. time fram MS~ SCHULTZ: Sure « right » THI [ra] COURT : The initial statement is January, and when is this? MS. SCHULTZ: So, your Honor, the email that went to the media, it was first issued on January 2, 2015; it was published on January 3, 2015; and the statement took place the next day, on January 4, 2015. THE COURT: Okay. MS. SCHULTZ: A recent opinion in this district, the Wheelings case, makes it clear that you can't reargue summary judgment on a motion in limine and also makes it clear that you can't say, oh, because one person THE was the second statement COURT: The issue is, defamatory? MS. SCHULTZ: I think that was an issue at summary judgment that Ms. Giuffre opposed in its entirety, and I think that's already been resolved. = THE COURT s How? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011399