HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011408.jpg

10 fd. 12 [3 14 15 16 i) 18 wife) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3vlgiu2 townhome, and she said part of it was a loan from Mr. that had been paid back, 105 Epstein and that's going to be years ago, before any of the defamatory allegations arose in this case. That's my understanding of the factual basis here. So we can I think deal with that particular issue, know, if and when it comes up, you but what I'm saying to the Court -- I mean, the Court and I are on the same pag sale of the townhome, you know, what did or didn't happen to of the townhome, phase of the trial. th the amount of the sale of the townhome, the money from the sale those are all off limits during the liability THE COURT: Well, correct me if I'm wrong. We don't have any evidence as to what happened to the proceeds of the sale. MR. PAGLIUCA: We don't. THE COURT: Oh, okay. MR. PAGLIUCA: There is none. aid cl [ra] COURT: Okay. MR. PAGLIUCA: And the notion that this money went outside of the jurisdiction of the court is pure fiction. Frankly, unless it went to some country that with, I think the jurisdiction of this court far. THE COURT: I think that's for another day. MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 I'm unfamiliar extends pretty HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011408