HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011414.jpg

10 fd. 12 [3 14 15 16 i) 18 wife) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3vlgiu2 paper came from is no person that will say, them and feel that because it 1a. Epstein's trash in the first instance. There we kept these documents and we have the originals and you can come look at them and you can test them. There is no person that will say any of t went to the grand jury and presumably, under Rule 60, it's never coming out of So the other point about these the grand jury again. message pads is, I don't to this day know whether that's just hand-picked portions of whatever plaintiff's counsel got years ago or it's the entirety of what, you know, Palm Beach did or didn't do, but when I asked D deposition, he tective Recarey those questions in his said, I can't tell you if that's everything. I just got handed this stuff by plai the course of this deposition, and about it. So that's another piece for the plaintiffs. There a witness, Ms. to introduce that transcript or, an audio recording of an in which they are ntiff that "s counsel, you know, in "s all I can tell you of this that's problematic "s another issue tha Hall, and the plain trying to introduce tiffs , but t relates to a transcript of , I think, want to try alternately, what they say is terview with her, and I'm not sure there are problems either way. The transcript, what I will call the Hall transcript, was in fact not prepared by the Palm Beach Police Department. According to Detectiv it before, during his deposition, SOUTHERN DISTRICT R (212) 805- Recarey, he had never seen and he surmised that it had EH PORT ERS, P.C. 0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011414