HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011426.jpg

10 fd. 12 [3 14 15 16 i) 18 wife) 20 21 22 23 24 25 123 H3vlgiu2 the business records exception. But even if it weren't to come in under the business records exception, it can come in not for the truth of the matter asserted but to show for knowledge. And you say in your June 20th order, "Notwithstanding the questions are directed to reveal relevant answers regarding defendant's knowledge of plaintiff's allegations, that knowledge goes directly to the truth or falsity of the defamation, a key element of plaintiff's claims." In other words, what Maxwell knew at the time she's making the statement goes to the truth of the falsity of those statements, and that includes this police report, your Honor, so we believe that it's critical evidence to show that. And you'll see that, again, she was working for the defendant at the time that this investigation happened. She has testified to that. She was on the flights with him at the time this was going on over 300 times during that period. THE COURT: You know, spare me the flights, okay? MS. McCAWLEY: Sure. Okay. THE COURT: I've heard that before. |e MS. McCAWLEY: Sure. I'm sorry, your Honor. I'll try to cut to the chase here. So certainly, you know, it's interesting, because you heard defense counsel here not too long ago saying that they wanted to get in police reports of an under-aged minor, Virginia Giuffre, from when she was 14, being raped by two SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011426