HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011431.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
10
fd.
12
[3
14
15
16
i)
18
wife)
20
21
22
23
24
25
128
H3vlgiu2
Thank you, your Honor.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Briefly, your Honor.
So first, we're doing a mix and match here of
different things, which I like the rules of evidence becaus
they're rules and I can read them and they say what they say.
Even if, even if, you had a gold-plated record
custodian from the Palm Beach Police Department come in here
and make all of the findings that you needed to find as a
business record exception or a government record exception, the
case law is absolutely clear that second- and thirdhand hearsay
is inadmissible through police reports.
I use this example because it's a good one, I think.
As part of my practice, I represent people accused of crimes,
and so we get discovery as part of my practice. Guess what?
That goes into my files and I keep it as a matter of course,
and it is a business record of mine because I keep it in due
course. Now that doesn't mean that it simply would get
admitted into a trial whole cloth for the truth of the matter
asserted, just because it's a business record of mine. And
why? What's the answer? Because the statements that are
included in the police report, or the discovery that I get,
that I put in my file and I keep very carefully as a business
record, don't magically become nonhearsay, because the peopl
who are making those statements are not under any business duty
to report to me. And that's what the business record exception
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011431
Extracted Information
Phone Numbers
Document Details
| Filename | HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011431.jpg |
| File Size | 0.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,578 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04T16:13:46.118999 |