HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011435.jpg

10 fd. 12 [3 14 15 16 i) 18 wife) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3vlgiu2 activity, that's the truth. MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, could be aware of the report her testimony is that she wo "90s until 2009. This inves 132 But aware of the reports. your Honor, and the reason why she she'll s is becaus remember, rked for Epstein from the early tigation took place in 2006, your the time she was allegedly managing Honor, during the course of the Palm person. So yes, of course, questions, Beach home and his active employee, we show her the report: Were you aware of this, his right-hand should be able to ask her those of these reports? Were you aware that these reports were made, you know, as part of this in answer that. THE COURT: Well, t You could show her the repor but that would not get the h MS. McCAWLEY: Well two other of the exceptions, which we talked about, and w residual hearsay -- EEE bu COURT: Yes, vestigation? And then she can hat's fine. You could do that. ts and say, were you aware of them, earsay part in. and of course we have , your Honor, the business record xception, e also noticed this as one of the t even as a business record, I under the business records think counsel is correct exception, the activities of becaus the cops and what they did, all of but that can go in, yes, not the statements. MS. McCAWLEY: So £ SOUTHERN DIST (21-2 they're under a duty, etc., or example, one of the witnesses on RICT REPORTERS, B.C. ) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011435