DOJ-OGR-00000426.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 20 j782epsC kjc MR. WE ay NGARTEN: refuse to answer questions forbid we make a mistake, . What we said at and Filed 07/16/19 Page 21 of 24 21 The last thing we did today was Pretrial is heaven in terms of assets, we wanted to be precise. So there was no refusal. time to supplement. That was accepted. There was a request for And that's part of the reason we want to sit down and make sur correct to provide to the court. MR. WEINGARTEN: THE COURT: Sure. Can MR. WEINGARTEN: THE COURT: All right. it is such a significant p alk ot at issue is ancient. It j s from 2002 to 2005. So obviously if Ww the defendant is a threat to take that into account. get our information I make one other point? n terms of the obstruction, I think our argument that the conduct to obstruct justice, the court needs The allegations raised -- and I just read them briefly because we just po defendant. Back when the Southern Dist attempting to find an appropriate remedy, discussions going back and statute? And it didn't wo is no factual basis. That obstruction. Not obstruct Florida agreed to the plea ck, is ive forth: got the government's tter relate to negotiations betw n th feds and the rict of Florida was there were Can we squeeze you into this and it didn't work because ther the refer acts. ne CO was no appropriate statute tha the stat to the alleged Instead, the feds in nse because ther covered cond (e) uct that was SOUTHERN D STR C I REPORT ERS, ( 212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00000426