DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke}
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 20
j782epsC kjc
that those victims weren't
horribles he has in mind.
the defendant's attendance can be assured.
But
Filed 07/16/19
treated as badly as
Page 23 of 24 23
the parade of
for now the question is whether
And with respect to the nonprosecution agreement --
THE
COURT:
only statutory rape.
"statutory rape"
I'm not sure
[ would refer to something as
The use of
I'm not sure sits well.
MR
LL
And I
» ROSSM
With respect
District of
nonprosecution agreement was Limited to
of Florida,
but
Florida has represented in p
and we can litigate that in
Wi
Mr. Weingart
th respec
ten says
that that i
not.
And,
conduct overlaps.
particular,
BR:
agree,
it is simply not relevant here.
to the statute of
that
t is beyond
the conduct is
the statute of
Bu
your
to the actual substance,
ublic
the Southern
old.
the word "only" before
t go ahead.
Honor.
the Southern
that the
filings
District
a motion to dismiss,
limitations,
He did not say
limitations because it is
finally, it is not the same conduct. Some of the
Some of the conduct does not. And in
one of the two counts of the indictment is
predicated exclusively on New York victims.
So
consider those responses as it awaits the defendant's
for all
oO
later this week.
f those reasons,
we just
ask the court to
filings
just make one point to clarify?
MR. WEINGARTEN: Can
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS,
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000428
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg |
| File Size | 586.9 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 89.6% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,606 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 16:01:26.279936 |